<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Annoying Nutritional Labeling Claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/</link>
	<description>Dietriffic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-3878</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-3878</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff,

It&#039;s a definitely something governments and health professionals need to be working on together to get right. Thanks for commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a definitely something governments and health professionals need to be working on together to get right. Thanks for commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-3869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-3869</guid>
		<description>I completely agree about fat free labels.  Especially since when somethig usually says fat free, it has more sugar or other nasties.

&lt;em&gt;Jeff&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://betterdigestivehealth.com/2008/08/16/magnesium-and-digestion/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Magnesium And Digestion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree about fat free labels.  Especially since when somethig usually says fat free, it has more sugar or other nasties.</p>
<p><em>Jeff&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://betterdigestivehealth.com/2008/08/16/magnesium-and-digestion/' rel="nofollow">Magnesium And Digestion</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 23:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Hi Kyle and Glenn - yes that&#039;s right! You can use the fat free claim as a guide, but often labels making this sort of claim are no better than a similar product with no claim! 

So, the best thing to do is look at the actual fat/sugar/salt content in grams per 100 gram, and compare this to the recommended amounts. See: http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/14/the-lowdown-on-food-labels/ for more info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kyle and Glenn &#8211; yes that&#8217;s right! You can use the fat free claim as a guide, but often labels making this sort of claim are no better than a similar product with no claim! </p>
<p>So, the best thing to do is look at the actual fat/sugar/salt content in grams per 100 gram, and compare this to the recommended amounts. See: <a href="http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/14/the-lowdown-on-food-labels/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/14/the-lowdown-on-food-labels/</a> for more info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I have often wondered that Kyle !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often wondered that Kyle !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dietriffic.com/2007/04/30/the-most-annoying-nutritional-labeling-claims/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>So, when something is labelled &#039;75% fat free&#039; - does that mean that the other 25% is fat?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when something is labelled &#8217;75% fat free&#8217; &#8211; does that mean that the other 25% is fat?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 26/38 queries in 0.039 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.dietriffic.com @ 2012-02-09 08:45:19 -->
